SAO PAULO (Reuters) -Brazil’s inflation remained well above the central bank’s target range in its mid-July reading, official data showed on Friday, as policymakers gather next week for a meeting at which they are widely expected to hold interest rates at a two-decade high.
Inflation in Latin America’s largest economy hit 5.30% in the 12 months through mid-July, statistics agency IBGE said, up from 5.27% a month earlier and slightly above the 5.26% expected by economists in a Reuters poll.
Brazil’s central bank targets inflation at 3%, plus or minus 1.5 percentage points, and policymakers have pledged to bring it back to that level.
The bank delivered 450 basis points in interest rate hikes between September and June, taking the benchmark Selic rate to 15%, the highest since July 2006. It signaled last month a “very prolonged” pause to assess the effects of the hikes.
“The mid-month inflation figures give policymakers no reason to consider raising rates again,” said Capital Economics’ emerging markets economist Kimberley Sperrfechter, who expects conditions to allow for rate cuts around the turn of the year.
The central bank’s rate-setting committee, known as Copom, is scheduled to meet on July 29 and 30.
In the month to mid-July alone, consumer prices as measured by the IPCA-15 index rose 0.33%, up from 0.26% in the previous month. The index had been expected to rise 0.30%, according to the median forecast in a Reuters poll.
The monthly increase was driven by higher housing costs as electricity prices climbed, IBGE said, as well as higher transport prices, with airfares jumping. Closely watched food and beverage prices, however, dropped for the second straight month.
“Today’s result will not influence Copom’s decision,” Inter senior economist Andre Valerio said. “It should keep interest rates unchanged, reaffirm its commitment to meeting the inflation target, and offer no indication of when it might begin a rate-cutting cycle.”
(Reporting by Gabriel Araujo. Additional reporting by Camila Moreira. Editing by Mark Potter)
Comments