By Mike Scarcella
(Reuters) – Food and drug retailer Kroger Co on Wednesday asked a U.S. judge to dismiss as “speculative” a consumer antitrust lawsuit alleging the company’s proposed $24.6 billion acquisition of rival Albertsons Companies Inc would lessen grocer competition and drive up prices.
Lawyers for Kroger said in a filing in California federal court that the grocery store shoppers who sued over the deal have failed to define the relevant market necessary to evaluate grocery store competition and to identify how the acquisition would hurt consumers. The attorneys said the lawsuit was lacking “real-world facts.”
U.S. competition law “does not turn every grocery store consumer in the country into a roving antitrust enforcer,” lawyers for Kroger told U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria.
A hearing is scheduled for May 18.
An Albertsons spokesperson declined to comment, and representatives for Kroger did not immediately respond to similar messages.
The suit from 25 consumers in states including California, Texas and Florida was filed amid the Federal Trade Commission’s review of Kroger’s proposed acquisition. State antitrust enforcers also are looking at the deal.
U.S. antitrust law allows private actions against mergers and acquisitions.
A lawyer for the plaintiffs did not immediately respond to a message seeking comment.
Kroger’s attorneys said in Wednesday’s filing that “the proposed merger is in the early stages of regulatory review and, as a part of that process, defendants expect to divest a number of stores.”
Attorneys for Albertsons separately asked the judge to dismiss a claim in the lawsuit challenging the propriety of a $4 billion special dividend that the company paid to shareholders.
A group of state attorneys general failed in state and federal courts to block the payment, which they alleged would weaken Albertsons, and Albertsons paid the dividend in January.
The deal would bring nearly 5,000 stores under one corporate umbrella.
Kroger controls stores under banners including Harris Teeter, Pay Less and King Soopers, and stores under the Albertsons umbrella include Balducci’s, Shaw’s, Kings and Safeway.
The case is Whalen v The Kroger Co, Albertsons Companies Inc et al, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 3:23-cv-00459-VC.
(Reporting by Mike Scarcella; editing by Leigh Jones)
