(Reuters) – Consumer-focused digital tokens issued by private companies could be better than central bank-issued tokens assuming the companies can be regulated appropriately, the Australian central bank governor said on Sunday.
Many central banks around the world are developing so-called central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), either retail tokens to be used directly by consumers or wholesale tokens to be used by banks within the financial system.
This is partly in response to the development of so-called stablecoins, privately issued tokens such as Tether and USDC, whose value is pegged to that of a traditional asset, often the U.S. dollar, which are typically used as a store of value and to make payments.
The risk of such tokens for financial systems were underscored in May when crypto markets were sent tumbling by the collapse of one stablecoin TerraUSD and its paired token Luna, though these helped underpin a network of decentralised finance (DeFi) applications, rather than being used to make real world payments.
“If these tokens are going to used widely by the community they are going to need to be backed by the state, or regulated just as we regulate bank deposits,” said Reserve Bank of Australia governor Phillip Lowe, speaking in a panel discussion of central bankers at a G20 finance officials meeting in Indonesia that was streamed online.
“I tend to think that the private solution is going to be better – if we can get the regulatory arrangements right – because the private sector is better than the central bank at innovating and designing features for these tokens, and there are also likely to be very significant costs for the central bank setting up a digital token system,” he said.
Lowe and his fellow panelists agreed that more needed to be done to create a sufficiently strong regulatory system for such tokens.
(Reporting by Alun John in Hong Kong; Editing by Muralikumar Anantharaman)
